Rochester Gas and Electric, operating as part of the Avangrid utility group alongside NYSEG, filed Case 25-E-0379 with the New York Public Service Commission requesting an increase in annual electric revenues of approximately $220.2 million — a 36% increase to delivery revenues and roughly 19.8% increase to total revenues. The case is currently pending before the PSC. While the final approved increase will almost certainly be lower than the requested amount following PSC review and negotiation, even a partial approval would push RG&E rates meaningfully higher than their current level of approximately 17¢/kWh.
The solar timing implication is direct. When a Rochester homeowner installs solar and interconnects with RG&E, they lock into net metering at the retail rate in effect at the time of interconnection — and that rate is guaranteed for 20 years under New York State policy. If RG&E rates increase by, say, 10% over the next few years, a homeowner who installed before that increase benefits from credits valued at the higher rate while having sized and priced their system at today’s economics. Every rate increase that occurs after a solar system is installed increases the annual savings from that system without increasing its cost. This is the structural advantage of installing solar ahead of known rate pressure rather than after.
RG&E rates have already climbed considerably. The statewide trajectory has been upward: New York electricity rates rose roughly 25% between 2021 and 2024. RG&E’s current rates reflect a mix that has historically benefited from access to low-cost hydroelectric power from Niagara Falls and a strong nuclear component in the regional grid, keeping RG&E rates below the statewide average. That structural advantage has been narrowing as infrastructure investment demands increase. The pending rate case captures grid modernization costs, clean energy integration expenses, and system reliability investments — all categories with continued pressure in coming rate cycles.
Rochester homeowners access the same core New York State incentive programs as Buffalo and NYC, with two notable differences — one favorable, one less so.
RG&E falls under the Upstate NY-Sun Megawatt Block, providing an upfront rebate of $0.20 per watt applied directly to the installer’s contract price. For a 10kW Rochester system, this delivers $2,000 off the top. The Upstate block operates on a declining-block structure; current rates should be confirmed with a NYSERDA-approved installer at the time of quoting. The New York State 25% solar tax credit applies statewide: 25% of eligible installation costs (after the MW Block rebate) up to a $5,000 maximum, as a direct state income tax credit carrying forward up to five years if it exceeds annual state tax liability. The 15-year property tax exemption under NYS Real Property Tax Law §487 applies — solar’s added value to Rochester home assessments is protected from property tax increases for 15 years. RG&E’s CBC charge is $1.16 per kW-DC per month, slightly lower than National Grid’s $1.45 — for a 10kW system, approximately $11.60/month unavoidably remains on each bill.
The notable difference: Monroe County does not provide full local sales tax exemption on solar equipment. New York State’s 4% sales tax is exempt statewide, but the local portion — Monroe County’s 4% — still applies to solar purchases. In contrast, Erie County (Buffalo) provides full exemption including local sales tax. On a $30,000 Rochester system, the Monroe County local sales tax represents approximately $1,200 in additional cost compared to the same system in Buffalo. This is not a reason to forgo solar — the state incentives more than compensate — but it is a factual difference that appears on Rochester installation contracts and should be understood before comparing quotes across markets.
Rochester Community Power operates a Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) program for City of Rochester electricity customers, offering residents an opt-out option for alternative supply sourced with renewable energy certificates. CCA participation does not affect solar net metering eligibility or the value of RG&E net metering credits — the utility’s delivery infrastructure and billing remain the same regardless of supply choice. Homeowners with solar systems interact with RG&E for net metering purposes whether or not they participate in Rochester Community Power for supply.
Rochester stands out in the upstate New York solar market for one statistic: the average monthly electricity consumption for EnergySage users in Rochester is approximately 1,149 kWh — nearly double Buffalo’s 640 kWh average and significantly higher than most other upstate markets. Higher consumption drives larger required system sizes to achieve 100% annual offset, which means higher upfront costs but also proportionally higher long-term savings.
EnergySage data shows the average Rochester system at approximately 11.4–12.6kW, costing approximately $30,000–$34,600 before incentives at roughly $2.74–$2.77 per watt. After the Upstate NY-Sun rebate ($0.20/W = ~$2,280 on 11.4kW) and the NY State 25% tax credit (up to $5,000 on the post-rebate cost), net cost is approximately $22,000–$27,000. The Monroe County local sales tax (4%) applies and adds approximately $1,200–$1,380 to the pre-incentive cost versus a full-exemption county. EnergySage projects a payback period of approximately 9.68 years for Monroe County — longer than Buffalo’s 7.7 years because the same 17¢/kWh rate serves a larger, more expensive system. The 25-year savings projection runs approximately $37,000–$42,000 on a purchased system, less than NYC’s $69,000 because the per-kWh net metering value is much lower (17¢ vs 31¢).
The longer payback compared to Buffalo warrants honest context. Rochester’s payback extends not because the solar resource is worse — peak sun hours are similar, both cities face cloudy upstate winters — but because the rate is lower relative to system size. The pending RG&E rate case changes this calculus materially. If approved at even half the requested level, Rochester’s payback period contracts and 25-year savings expand significantly. A homeowner who installs at today’s economics and locks in 20-year net metering benefits from any approved rate increase without bearing additional system cost. Rochester homes also tend to use substantial electricity for heating (many are transitioning from gas to heat pumps), and households with electric heating or EVs may find larger systems improve the economics further by absorbing more of that consumption.